Fitness for Service – Alternatives for equipment validation

Boiler and pressure equipment manufacturers face everyday strict design and manufacturing requirements to supply heat exchangers, pressure vessels or process equipment.

The recognized international design and manufacturing codes that are prescribed for this type of equipment (ASME VIII Div. 1 & 2, EN13445, AD2000, etc.) specify those tests, trials, inspections and quality controls to be complied in order to obtain the corresponding stamp or certificate, as mandatory requirement of the end user.

Generally, such equipment favorably comply with the controls and are eligible to achieve the corresponding stamp or certification. However, sometimes and due to multiple factors, equipment might show some type of defect or imperfection: ovalization, out-of-roundness, buckling defects, loss of thickness and/or weld misalignments, among others.

Such defects might cause a non-compliance with the requirements for equipment validation set up by the applicable design code and / or exceed the allowable manufacturing tolerances. What would happen then?

Up to date, equipment manufacturers had to assume design, manufacturing and/or assembly errors at their own cost (replacing, repairing or re-manufacturing in worst-case scenario)

Besides the significant additional costs to be committed by the manufacturer, it should also be considered as critical, the impact on the global schedule of the project, in terms of additional time to repair or re-manufacture.

Alternatives for equipment validation

Aware of this manufacturer’s critical concern, at CADE we provide powerful alternatives to the conventional design codes, by means of the application of innovative methods and engineering tools when facing such an issue. Said methods allow us to validate fitness for equipment’s service even when detected defects or imperfections are out of code’s allowable tolerances.

To that end, we usually combine finite element simulation tools (FEA) with the application of recognized engineering codes and standards, such as código API 579/ASME FFS-1 (Fitness for Service).

According to the inspection survey, detected defect or defects are implemented in the simulation in order to assess the actual behavior of the item under evaluation. Thereby, it is possible to determine whether the defect is critical or has no influence on its service, in which case an engineering assessment supported by code becomes mandatory.

Our goal is to provide manufacturers with an alternative tool for the validation of defective equipment, not necessarily implying a design modification and / or replacement of defective components, thereby avoiding additional costs or time.

Example:

Fitness for Service assessment of tank presenting ovalization defects out of tolerance

Further information:

For any question or further information request about our methodology for equipment validation, please complete the following form:

Study of deformations and the prestressing process in pressure equipment flanges

Study of deformations and the prestressing process in pressure equipment flanges

The flanged joints of pressure equipment can show deformations due to the bolt tightening process, or being generated later during service. The appearance of this type of problem may mean that the equipment is not suitable to continue with the operation, with the consequent economic impact that would entail a stop, repair or replacement of the affected components. Through FEA simulation […]

Design and FEM analysis of equipment and conductors made of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)

Design and FEM analysis of equipment and conductors made of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)

There are many sectors (chemical and process industry, naval, aeronautical or food sector) and industrial applications in which it is necessary to design and validate equipment made with special materials (FRP- Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic), due to to the special corrosion resistance requirements for which they have to provide service. This is the case of pressure […]

Fitness for service procedures for cracks like flaws

Fitness for service procedures for cracks like flaws

During the life cycle of many pressure vessels arise the necessity to maintain them in service after detecting crack-like flaws or delamination. For that, there are some methodologies that allow establishing a quantitative judgment about if it is possible to safely operate this equipment and also determine its remaining life until it must be repaired […]

STRESS ANALYSIS OF PIPES WITH RATIO D / t> 100

STRESS ANALYSIS OF PIPES WITH RATIO D / t> 100

On certain occasions, during the development of projects where large diameter pipes are involved, scenarios arise in which the diameter (D) / thickness (t) ratio is higher than 100. It is common to find this situation in systems with large diameter pipes that work at low pressure, in which the calculated thickness due to the […]

CFD analysis of heat recovery boilers– HRSG

CFD analysis of heat recovery boilers– HRSG

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD analysis) simulation of HRSG Boilers turns out to be a powerful engineering methodology in order to determine an optimal design to achieve maximum efficiency and avoid future operation issues, (such as incorrect mixing ratio, asymmetric burner performance, among others.). This type of simulations allows to analyze the behaviour of the chemical […]

Fitness for Service – Alternatives for equipment validation

Fitness for Service – Alternatives for equipment validation

Boiler and pressure equipment manufacturers face everyday strict design and manufacturing requirements to supply heat exchangers, pressure vessels or process equipment. The recognized international design and manufacturing codes that are prescribed for this type of equipment (ASME VIII Div. 1 & 2, EN13445, AD2000, etc.) specify those tests, trials, inspections and quality controls to be […]

1 2 3 4