Structural simulation of railway rolling stock using finite element method analysis

ADVANTAGES OF INCORPORATING THE SUSPENSION SYSTEM TO THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL​
ADVANTAGES OF INCORPORATING THE SUSPENSION SYSTEM TO THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

CADE usually employs the Finite Element Method (FEM) to undertake the simulation modelling and analysis of complex structural elements. Thus, this method is often used to analyse critical mechanical parts and elements, whose performance may be conditioned or influenced by other mechanical systems or elements.

In the railway sector and, more specifically, in the analysis of railway frame structures, the consideration of suspension systems (bogies) in its Finite Element Analysis becomes highly relevant: taking it into consideration may allow to characterise (in the most realistic way possible) the bogie rigidity transmitted to the frame structure, according to the requirements of the standard «UNE-EN 12663 (2014) Structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies».

The difference between implementing or not implementing the suspension system in the finite element analysis can be easily quantified. The results can be compared by analyzing the simulation of a multi-axle railway frame, applying the finite element method and using ANSYS software. For this purpose, two calculation models must be considered:

  • Model implementing the suspension system.
  • Model without implementation of the suspension system.

Results in the analysis of railway frame structures

Equivalent von Mises stress (MPa)

Stress distribution in both calculation models analysed (with and without suspension system).

Model implementing the suspension system

Model without implementation of the suspension system

Considering that stress results are the most important indicators when validating a structure of this type, not to include bogies in finite element analysis might be a too conservative premise, from the structural integrity point of view, that may unnecessarily increase the material and manufacture costs.

Lineal buckling. First deformation mode (mm)

Modelo considerando el sistema de suspensión​​

Modos Factor pandeo
1.9.81
2.10.55
3.11.45
4.14.92
5.17.11
6.17.37
7.17.76
8.17.81
9.18.02
10.18.06

Modelo SIN considerar el sistema de suspensión​

Modos Factor pandeo
1.13.45
2.16.95
3.17.19
4.17.28
5.17.38
6.17.55
7.17.62
8.17.66
9.17.89
10.19.01

Continuing with the comparative results and observing the deformation modes and buckling factors, it appears that the implementation of bogies in the finite element analysis provides higher safety factors against buckling. In fact, considering the suspension system in the model allows to identify buckling modes that cannot be identified in finite element models without it. When the suspension system is not considered, the direct application of boundary conditions on the frame stiffens the model, generating hardly conservative safety values ​​against buckling and showing fictitious failure modes.

Conclusions of the analysis of railway frames with and without bogies

In conclusion, by considering bogies in railway frames validation, CADE achieves:

  • To lighten railway structures, reducing material and manufacturing costs.
  • To obtain safer railway structures, because it is possible to identify buckling modes (not found with finite element analysis without bogies consideration) and at the same time, to obtain higher safety factors against buckling.

What is a suspensions system (bogie)?

The suspension system consists of a primary suspension (which transmits efforts between the wheels and the bogie) and a secondary suspension (which is responsible for transmitting the efforts between the bogie and the frame of the railway vehicle).

Both suspensions consist of a series of springs and shock absorbers that allow to transmit efforts between the wheels, the bogie and the railway frame.

Experts in Analysis and Simulation

CADE is specialized in mechanical and industrial engineering, being a pioneer in the use of applications of computer-aided engineering (CAE) for solutions in Oil&Gas and Power Generation Industry, among other industries. Therefore, with more than 15 years of experience, CADE provides simulation modelling, engineering and consulting services, finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in equipment, high pressure ducts and non-conventional structures.

Further information about finite element analysis and simulation modelling in railway frames:

For any further information about advanced engineering services of design and consultancy for railway frames, you can contact us on +34 967 19 01 72, email cade@cadesoluciones.com or complete the form bellow:

Study of deformations and the prestressing process in pressure equipment flanges

Study of deformations and the prestressing process in pressure equipment flanges

The flanged joints of pressure equipment can show deformations due to the bolt tightening process, or being generated later during service. The appearance of this type of problem may mean that the equipment is not suitable to continue with the operation, with the consequent economic impact that would entail a stop, repair or replacement of the affected components. Through FEA simulation […]

Design and FEM analysis of equipment and conductors made of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)

Design and FEM analysis of equipment and conductors made of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)

There are many sectors (chemical and process industry, naval, aeronautical or food sector) and industrial applications in which it is necessary to design and validate equipment made with special materials (FRP- Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic), due to to the special corrosion resistance requirements for which they have to provide service. This is the case of pressure […]

Fitness for service procedures for cracks like flaws

Fitness for service procedures for cracks like flaws

During the life cycle of many pressure vessels arise the necessity to maintain them in service after detecting crack-like flaws or delamination. For that, there are some methodologies that allow establishing a quantitative judgment about if it is possible to safely operate this equipment and also determine its remaining life until it must be repaired […]

STRESS ANALYSIS OF PIPES WITH RATIO D / t> 100

STRESS ANALYSIS OF PIPES WITH RATIO D / t> 100

On certain occasions, during the development of projects where large diameter pipes are involved, scenarios arise in which the diameter (D) / thickness (t) ratio is higher than 100. It is common to find this situation in systems with large diameter pipes that work at low pressure, in which the calculated thickness due to the […]

CFD analysis of heat recovery boilers– HRSG

CFD analysis of heat recovery boilers– HRSG

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD analysis) simulation of HRSG Boilers turns out to be a powerful engineering methodology in order to determine an optimal design to achieve maximum efficiency and avoid future operation issues, (such as incorrect mixing ratio, asymmetric burner performance, among others.). This type of simulations allows to analyze the behaviour of the chemical […]

Fitness for Service – Alternatives for equipment validation

Fitness for Service – Alternatives for equipment validation

Boiler and pressure equipment manufacturers face everyday strict design and manufacturing requirements to supply heat exchangers, pressure vessels or process equipment. The recognized international design and manufacturing codes that are prescribed for this type of equipment (ASME VIII Div. 1 & 2, EN13445, AD2000, etc.) specify those tests, trials, inspections and quality controls to be […]

1 2 3 4